Casablanca :: essays research papers

How can a hero survive in a instauration gone mad? Casablanca, the classic 1940s film, was known as the greatest movie ever by some, and also seen as being one of the close important novels of the 20th century, revolve around a world in confusion, where no one trusts anybody else, and a warfare wages on within and without. squirm dealt with a world rocked by the impacts of World War II, where everyone was a spy, and even the spies were spied on. change state is a cynic, tossed into a chaotic yet romantic world, and comes forth victorious.In Casablanca, we emerge with a shade of hope, and joy, that the forces of good can win, and that eventually we will triumph over our enemies, wherever or whatever they may be. While slochky and romantic, Casablanca is a touching movie, and probably one of the best ever made. It takes place in a world gone mad, where nothing is truth, and reality is always questionable.      Sam of course, is stability. He cant be bought or sold, and is seemingly a constant, always there and never too deep into the problems of the world. Sam represents the carefree aspect in all of us, the feeling that wed just as soon turn our attention away from the war and hum a tune. Rick faces the ultimate human enemy which is the unimportance of an individual. Rick exemplifies this theme, as he relates to Ilsa "The problems of two little people dont amount to a hill of beans in this crazy world." Simply put, individuals dont matter. That the events surrounding their world and time get the best those of the individual. Casablanca deals with a festive arena in the midst of war, Ricks Caf Americain,yet it is set in a typical place that is different than the surrounding world. Outside Ricks a war wages on, but inside thekindly caf, an atmosphere of warmth and freedom emanates. Yet it is soon crushed bythe iron fist of the Germans attempting to capture the varlet Lazlow.Ricks world is apartby forces beyond his control which he wins in the end. In summary, Casablanca revolved around the idea that humanity is losing its personalidentity to that of the masses. The individual, in both cases, is far less important to that